DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2115 Version: 1.3-current Right.. it's a strange problem. However, I'm pretty sure the code implementation discrepancy in fl_height(int,int) vs. fl_height(void) has got to be fixed. fl_height(void) returns the ascent+descent, whereas fl_height(int,int) just returns the second argument. Both should do the same thing, and surely fl_height(int,int) should do what fl_height(void) does internally so that their behavior is the same. Regarding the fontsize vs. actual pixel size, I'm not sure what to offer, and it's probably true a lot of widgets likely use the pixel size value instead of fl_height() and friends, my own widgets probably being among them. However, in light of the above, I feel the urge to modify all those widgets to switch to using fl_height() and fl_measure() to ensure my commercial apps look right. Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2115 Version: 1.3-current _______________________________________________ fltk-bugs mailing list fltk-bugs@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-bugs
