> Sounds like Fabien is willing to do the footwork > to port it to FLTK: Yes, I would but ... > I imagine it should be put to vote among the devs > to add it to the main branch, as it's a significant > bit of code. .. then indeed it would should be discussed what exactly we should import as many widgets might not be worth it today with fltk1.3 and sup.
I would vote personally for starting with minimum requirements would be: A stripped version (no Fl_DND) feature of the Fl_Tree to keep consistency among the current 1.3 branch. END Now, in the eventuality that another tree class variant like the flu tree would be officially welcomed ; we would probably need a serious code refactoring effort which I can also lead but I would need discussion on the naming/scoping part. I'm in if the team also is ! _______________________________________________ fltk-bugs mailing list fltk-bugs@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-bugs
