MacArthur, Ian (SELEX) (UK) wrote: > >>> Absolutely. The font number must be a 32bit integer pointing into a >>> self-expanding array. There are a few other spots wher this applies, >>> like box types (ok, maybe 16bit are enough here) and symbols. >> You think maybe unsigned 16-bit is not enough for a font >> list? That's a lot of fonts... > > Reading that back, it sounds a bit harsh - I was meaning to be humorous! > > Anyway... I've started on this now. I've made a new "type" specifically > for font indexes, the plan being that if we decide to change the size
I hope this type is only internal implementation of private member so there are no cryptic type names in public api. Please keep public api as "int" or similar standard type. Roman _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
