Michael Sweet wrote: > Albrecht Schlosser wrote: >> So here is my vote: >> >> +1 for making Fl_Shared_Image::copy() return Fl_Shared_Image*. > > -1, since you can't overload the return type of virtual methods.
Okay, I did't see that aspect, you and Fa convinced me ;-) I officially take my request to change it back, no more votes needed. > > ... >> Fl_Shared_Image::refcount() should *REALLY* be private or at least >> protected! This would prevent code like this: >> ... >> My vote: >> >> +1 for making refcount() private. > > If anything it needs to be protected so that subclasses can access > the count. Okay, too, then I vote for protected. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
