Greg Ercolano wrote: > I just noticed this in fltk.bugs: > > Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: >> The fltk2 license is "May 2001" but the fltk1.1 license is "December 2001". >> The "May 2001" license cannot be approved in Debian and so the fltk2 Debian >> package cannot be uploaded. Please change the license to "December 2001" >> (fltk1.1). > > Is FLTK 2.0 even "released" yet? > > I'm surprised to hear fltk2 getting into linux distros > if it's still in dev, (as surprised as I'd be if I heard > 1.3.x ended up in a linux distro, when it hasn't released yet) > but maybe I just haven't been keeping up? > > I guess I'm curious; should pre-release code be getting > distributed in the linux distros?
Greg, it is because Dillo. That is the only reason. Dillo has been chosen by small distributions because it is fast and light. It is based on FLTK2, so packagers ship FLTK2 together. I see no problem in this because FLTK1 and FLTK2 can coexist together without any problem. I have both installed in /usr and everything works fine. :) Regards _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
