On 20 Sep 2009, at 16:04, Matthias Melcher wrote: >> >> Yes, we reworked the image library tests (png + jpeg) a lot. > > Yes, I looked at the differences too, and as long as they are somewhat > local, I think we can risk replacing the 1.1 part with the 1.3 part. > Albrecht, since you are familiar with the code, could you please > integrate this.
I remember that we fixed it (I do remember complaining about it though!) but don't have any recollection of what was done, or by whom. I don't think it was me - was probably Albrecht I think and/or maybe Fabien? > Ian, you seem to have the complete test environment. > Could you then test Albrechts changes. Will do, but note that I do not have access to a Mac running 10.6, which does bring its own unique set of issues, so someone else will have to try that. Also my linux boxes are now all ubuntu, and the oldest I have is 8.04 (which is the current LTS release) so I can't test the older linux variants - I used to have some FC5 and FC7 boxes too, but they are gone now. > I'll be happy to launch rc2 in a week or so. OK.g > Because once 1.1 is done, I will block any more STR's against it - and > I will likely mentioned that in every mail from now on ;^) OK, but I still think it would be cool if we could get to 1.1.11 ;-) (IIRC, the 1.0 series stopped at 1.0.10, so 1.1 ought to go to 1.1.11 if we follow the pattern. Not that I'm obsessed with patterns or anything, of course! Still, I suppose we could say that stopping after 10 patch-versions was a pattern too...) -- Ian _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
