I just wanted to clarify one thing - if you take a closer look, FLTK 2  
project is "all-in-one" as well. Bill started making a compatibility layer  
with FLTK 1, and IMHO that is the way to do it.

Pardon me, but I do not see the point of reinventing the wheel and making  
yet another "all-in-one" branch.

Do not get me wrong, I do not want to start yet another flame war here, it  
is just my point of view. I appreciate very much what Matt does, but I  
fear it will be just yet another huge branch in history of FLTK... :(

Kind regards
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to