On 14.12.2009, at 09:17, manolo gouy wrote: > >> >> I also don't think that it's worth the effort to display the dragged text, >> because this would be Mac-specific, and I'm sure that other users wouldn't >> like it. Thus my proposal: use a generic image (or cursor symbol or ...), >> just as it was before and as it is on other platforms. >> >> Just my 2 ct. > > I proposed to display the dragged text because this is what is done by most > well-behaved Mac applications (Firefox, TextEdit, TextWrangler, > MSWord) although OpenOffice just shows a small black square. > > You guys decide whether to accept dynamic_cast and display dragged > text as an image, or not.
Seeing the text is great. It's what the Mac user expect, it's there, and it's system specific anyways. Please stick with it. The dynamic_cast is fine because it is in a system specific file. We would just like to avoid "advanced C++" in the main code because some embedded systems have minimal C++ implementations only (or can highly optimize code if dynamic casting is disabled). Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
