On 02/17/12 15:15, Mike Tsakiris wrote:
> I know is not the proper place for it but just a small observation.
Actually, this is probably the exact right place for this,
as this group is for discussions regarding the internals.
> Dont you think that using the label "fltk3" might create problem in
> future upgades?. Something like "Fltk" might be a better choice.
Sounds like a good question, I'll wait to see what folks
here say.. but you've come to the right place for sure.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
