Maxim Levitsky wrote: > I already I asked this on fltk-dev, and got a nice response there, > but since I see that this is the main list, I want to ask here too, few > questions. > > 1 - What the fate of FLTK 2.0 > Since I don't have any code in fltk 1.1 I would like to use it, > There are several reasons for that, like the UTF-8 support, more widgets, > cleaner code, for example the C++ name-spaces are great.
Using fltk2 should not be a problem. > When you expect it will be released? > Your guess is as good as mine. > 2 - Does fltk 2.0 support the 'plastic theme'? > Yes (see buttons.cxx), albeit you might need to do a tad more work to make it work on all widgets, as there are some rogue widgets that don't use the default style. fltk has stylegroups to help with this. > 3 - How much work is left to finish fltk 2.0? Again, your guess is as good as mine. There's not really a (missing) feature list for 2.0. Most of the stuff that 2.0 was set out to address (unicode, namespaces, themes, etc) are already in place. There are still areas of the public api that are still cumbersome or not well documented, including the TextDisplay, the browser, etc. -- Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] AMD4400 - ASUS48N-E GeForce7300GT Xubuntu Gutsy _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
