On 14.03.2008, at 23:31, Duncan Gibson wrote:
> I wrote:
>>> I just want to say that the poll is a great idea.
>>> But apart from the obvious typo ("mojor") should
>>> that be FLTK2.1 or FLTK1.2 that we keep in mind?
>
> matthiasm replied:
>> I hope it is clearer now.
>
> Yes that's much clearer. Just to be crystal clear though,
> what was 1.2 supposed to offer over 1.1?
>
> IIRC, 1.2 did, or was going to, offer utf8 and device
> independent printing. Was there anything else major?
> I just want to get my ducks in a row before I vote :-)
Yes, pretty much. It was an "unofficial" jump ahead. It is really hard
to maintain parallel versions of a software, particularly if the
difference is as invasive as the UTF-8 upgrade.
----
http://robowerk.com/
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
