In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roman Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was recently playing with new (3 weeks old) code::blocks release (on > windows with mingw and msvc) and I must say it is quite solid, although > there is place for improvement (ie debugger integration could be better, > tooltips -code completition- sometimes are annoying and do not want > want to go away...) But in my oppinion it is much better than devc++ - > although I have used devc++ about a year ago, this might have changed... I tried installing code:blocks, I'm giving it a try. I always had some issues with the debugger interface with dev-c++ that kept backfiring. Why IDEs don't present a _working_ debugger console by default, oh why??? > Main advantage is that c::b is crossplatform (linux (*nix?), mac and > win), devc++ - to my knowledge - is windows only (written in delphi) Oddly enough, I only ever used IDEs on windows. I'm using normal editors and Makefiles on all the other platforms I ever worked on. I know I could use msys or cygwin, but it always felt so slow I ultimately always switched to an IDE to compensate. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
