Greg Ercolano wrote: > The reason I haven't ported it is I never really got on board > with FLTK2, because I have a lot of legacy code I actively maintain > that is locked to FLTK1 source, so I'll probably be one of the last > to move to FLTK2.
FLTK 2 is really nice imho (more C++ API etc). Btw, can one help on working on FLTK 2? I.e. I wanted to integrated some changes into FTLK 2 SVN. There seems to be lot of small hacks and ideas done by users, which takes long time to reach SVN _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
