On 21.09.2008, at 20:27, imacarthur wrote: > yes - that's pretty much the way I see it, except that I worry that > it is fltk that is awry here, and it is our code that is multiplying > the existing matrix rather than doing an explicit set... > Only I don't know enough about this to know either way.
Yes ;-) I am multiplying. I am not even sure if setting the matrix is part of the API. Quartz is quite tricky that way ;-) ---- http://robowerk.com/ _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
