Matthias Melcher wrote: > > On 11.09.2009, at 12:05, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: > >> >>> I would vote to ditch Fl->FL symlinks altogether not to complicate >>> configure files unnecessarily and put this incompatible change into >>> documentation within fltk-1.1 -> fltk-1.3 transition module. It would >>> encourage the users to correct "FL/" in their sources and >>> write portable >>> code. >> >> +1 > > +1
+1 from me too. But what about the .h -> .H links? Drop them too? IMHO we should do this too, because this will make things absolutely clear: only correct spelling works. [ The only drawback I can see is that we might get lots of feedback about compile errors because of missing header files. And the OP's problem with mixing FLTK versions might become bigger, because old installed headers/links might exist, as in the OP's case. ] Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
