> It seems to me that some of the goals of fltk-1.3.x have already been > reached, namely printing support, a Table widget, and doxygen docs. > The last major issue is UTF-8, which dominates the 1.3 Roadmap. > > Can we split UTF-8 support down into slices, and aim for those? > To see whether this even makes sense, I would propose having a new > poll question along the lines of: > > What level of character support do you require from FLTK in the future? > 1. plain ASCII only, so UTF-8 support needed > 2. ASCII plus Western accented characters > 3. simple left-to-right character sets (Greek, Cyrillic...) > 4. simple right-to-left character sets (Arabic, Hebrew...) > 5. complex character sets (Chinese, Japanese, Korean...) > > Maybe someone more well versed in such things can provide a better > set of categories or descriptions than I have, but you get the idea.
Oops! This was supposed to go in fltk.development not fltk.general :-( D _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
