> I don't worry about costs of runtime, but about complexity of code. > Don't you think, this will bloat developers problems a lot? I > did such > things myself, but I learned, after keeping it simple it's > often a good > idea, to make it more simple. Is this complexity really useful enough?
In this case, I'd say yes (I may well be wrong, of course!) Two reasons why this is a useful complexity: 1) It makes the compatibility layer more feasible. 2) It may make it easier to write bindings for other languages to use the fltk libs. Both of these seem like valuable additions to me, and worth the extra complexity. YMMV... SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
