Biggest breaking change, that I'm aware of, is the Oracle dialects change a bit. Oh, and parameters for schema export change slightly.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, James Gregory<[email protected]> wrote: > In that case, I'll consider it. My main reluctance to maintaining two > versions is if there are breaking changes between them. Swapping binaries is > no biggie though. > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Hudson Akridge <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I was using FNH with NH 2.1 alpha and didn't notice any problems. Just >> swapped the binary, recompiled and away I went. ran about 300 unit tests in >> my persistence testing framework without any issues. >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:19 PM, James Gregory <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Are there any breaking changes we need to be aware of? >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Pci <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm actually using FHN with nh 2.1, by rebuilding FHN by myself. But I >>>> feel it would be helpfull 4 everyone having FHN binaries supporting nh >>>> 2.1 being published automatically over FHN website at the side by side >>>> with binaries against nh 2.0. >>>> >>>> So this mails is nothing more than a respectful request to >>>> fluenthibernate.org mantainers. May it be? >>>> >>>> Greets.. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> - Hudson >> http://www.bestguesstheory.com >> http://twitter.com/HudsonAkridge >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
