Performance has been taken care of in version 1+ :) 2009/8/13 Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjo...@gmail.com>
> > Wasn't there talk about building HBM objects directly instead of going > through the XML files (that need the painstakingly slow validation)? Won't > that speed things up quite a bit, and isn't that a change independent of > NH? > > > -Asbjørn > > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:16:15 +0200, James Gregory > <jagregory....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Depends :) It's down to NH, not FNH really. NH takes quite a while to > > validate what we give it. > > Do your unit tests need the entire domain? If not you could build a > > separate > > PersistenceModel instance with just the classes you need in. > > > > In our model branch (which will become 1.0 in the not-too-distant future) > > we've implemented merging of mappings, which speeds up BuildConfiguration > > when there's a lot of mappings. > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Mikael Henriksson > > <mik...@zoolutions.se>wrote: > > > >> Is it possible to tweak the configuration part for performance somehow? > >> Now > >> that the number of classes increased unit testing has become a bitch. It > >> takes forever to do .BuildConfiguration(). Is there something I can do > >> to > >> improve this time? When it's deployed I don't give a rats ass but while > >> I > >> run my tests etc it has become sort of annoying! > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
