On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:58:39 +0200, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is there a reason the base class is not marked as virtual or the new >> keyword is not used on the subclass? > > No reason. So if someone patches this up all over with either "virtual" (preferably, I guess) or "new", you might merge it into the master branch at some point? :) -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [email protected] «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away» --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
