Hi. If I've interpreted the issue right, there isn't a way to set columnname
om composite id's. However. I'm having an issue with this that I'm sure
someone has a workaround for:
The mapping:
CompositeId()
.KeyReference(a => a.Person)
.KeyReference(a => a.AddressType);
Map(a => a.AddressLine1);
Map(a => a.AddressLine2);
Map(a => a.ZipCode);
Map(a => a.City);
Map(a => a.Country);
Creates this SQL:
create table [Address] (
Person INT not null,
AddressType INT not null,
AddressLine1 NVARCHAR(255) not null,
AddressLine2 NVARCHAR(255) not null,
ZipCode NVARCHAR(255) not null,
City NVARCHAR(255) not null,
Country NVARCHAR(255) not null,
PersonId INT null,
primary key (Person, AddressType)
)
Where does the nullable PersonId come from? (I add ForeignKey.EndsWith("Id")
in the mapping, but without it I get Person_id)
I tried adding this:
References(a => a.Person).Column("Person");
to make them use the same column, but no difference.
I even have a IReferenceConvention not allowing any nullable fk's, so I
don't understand where the nullable PersonId comes from at all!
Thankful for any help!
/Peter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
