James, That's great news about NH3.0 integ.
Have you considered re-versioning FNH to "3.0" to match NH, and create less confusion for n00bs (like me)? Ariel Raunstien +972-522-747408 http://www.QuickUnit.com/blogs/ariel On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:32 AM, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > I wouldn't worry too much about the implementation of the user type. I > believe we're really just using that to check that the automapper can detect > them, I don't think the implementation matters as long as it compiles. > > I started looking at integrating NH3 last night. I'm nearly there, just > having some assembly versioning issues with Castle.Core. Should hopefully > have it done in the next day or so. > > What I'm aiming to do is make v1.x NH agnostic, so we'll release an NH2.1.2 > and NH3.0 version of it when we come to release 1.2. The master/2.0 line > will be NH3.0 only. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Fluent NHibernate" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
