well, so far this discussion has been about the community's (or at least a
loud subset) disagreement with Microsoft's take on the matter.

I'm not trying nor wanting to get into the middle of that.
People are starting an argument with me about my domain. A domain which
doesn't prevent me from accomplishing what i want, but makes the community
shake their fist in the air.

A new set of classes identical-except-for-one-property classes that sit
between my db abstraction (nhib) and my DTO (ria generated) seems like a lot
of overhead for purist domain design from the perspective of
database-abstraction.

I think your iphone-as-hammer metaphor is a lot exaggerated. the difference
is the iphone isn't used as a hammer to nail different types of nails, yet
my TicketID is merely one specialized type of nail.

The 'answers' i'm getting is more like someone asking a guy at the hardware
store if he should use his metal hammer to hammer hardened nails, and the
guy says no. But that's not complete -- The guy should really say, NO, NOT
WITHOUT EYE PROTECTION.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.

Reply via email to