On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:51:09 -0700 Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the wet parameter is related to how much of the "wet" reverb > signal is being mixed into the output. Yes. Renaming it as something else would probably be silly; I was being (at least) temporarily stupid. > Most of the magic is occurring in the fluid_revmodel_processreplace() and > fluid_revmodel_processmix() functions. I think its correct to use it as the > level of the reverb, although I'm not certain if it currently has the desired > effect or not. It's probably cleaner, and is arguably more correct, than the effect level patch. It could be extended, by analogy, to the chorus effect module by adding a fluid_clip() operation there, and probably adjusting the initial level. Another point is whether the following element of the effect level patch should be kept or removed (in fluid_chorus.c:fluid_chorus_processreplace): /* average values based on number of chorus stages */ if (chorus->number_blocks) d_out /= chorus->number_blocks; _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev