On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:51:09 -0700
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the wet parameter is related to how much of the "wet" reverb
> signal is being mixed into the output.
Yes. Renaming it as something else would probably be silly; I was being (at
least) temporarily stupid.
> Most of the magic is occurring in the fluid_revmodel_processreplace() and
> fluid_revmodel_processmix() functions. I think its correct to use it as the
> level of the reverb, although I'm not certain if it currently has the desired
> effect or not.
It's probably cleaner, and is arguably more correct, than the effect level
patch. It could be extended, by analogy, to the chorus effect module by adding
a fluid_clip() operation there, and probably adjusting the initial level.
Another point is whether the following element of the effect level patch should
be kept or removed (in fluid_chorus.c:fluid_chorus_processreplace):
/* average values based on number of chorus stages */
if (chorus->number_blocks)
d_out /= chorus->number_blocks;
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
