On Thursday, July 29, 2010, Elimar Green wrote: > Not sure I understand what is going on with this one, but it sounds > like it could perhaps be something I had a hand in breaking ;) > > Therefore a feel slightly more responsibility in helping to resolve > it. Do we know what specific logic changed in FluidSynth and why? > I'm sure there is an SVN log entry that might help explain things as > well as an email archive trail.
I've traced the problem to revision 172 by diwic, Wed Apr 15 04:08:16 2009 UTC http://fluidsynth.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fluidsynth/trunk/fluidsynth/src/fluid_chan.c?r1=143&r2=172&pathrev=303 Mailing list thread http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/fluid-dev/2009-04/msg00015.html > It sounds as if its related to the > whole gm/gs mode mess that was never really correctly resolved. > > Let me know if I should look into it. Still traveling about with > intermittent access, but I could make the extra effort if need be. > > I just logged into the FluidSynth Trac bug system and noticed that > almost all the bugs are gone. I can't imagine they have all been > fixed and suspect that instead they were auto removed because they > weren't assigned to anyone. Hmmm. I wonder if they can be revived. > The scripts I used to add the bugs are unfortunately not accessible to > me at the moment. > > Best regards, > > Elimar Regards, Pedro _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
