On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:39:49 +1100 Matt Giuca <matt.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for that good clarification. I've been confused as to whether > we were supposed to be using trac or not. > > Perhaps we can create some kind of "virtual" sf.net user, that owns > all new > > tickets, and has the fluid-dev list registered as his "home email" > > so that all ticket notifications get posted to the dev list? > > Opinions are welcome. > > > > As someone who is casually subscribed to fluid-dev and occasionally > reads the discussions, I wouldn't mind having the bug activity come > through into my inbox either. If the volume got too heavy, maybe you > could create a new mailing list called fluid-bugs, so that people can > separately decide to subscribe to the main mailing list and the bug > activity. But at the current activity levels, I think it would be > perfectly fine to spam the bug activity into this list. (Also it > would fix the problem of people posting to fluid-dev, not trac, for > fear of having their bugs go unnoticed -- since they would all go > through fluid-dev you could report them to the semantically-correct > place.) I think trac can be can configured to only send notifications for new tickets. That way traffic would remain low but anyone who's interested can just CC themselves to the ticket. James _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
