On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:40:30 +0100 David Henningsson <di...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > > On 2014-10-31 21:48, Antonio Ospite wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:08:16 +0200 > > Antonio Ospite <a...@ao2.it> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was checking out the code to see if a certain memleak was fixed > >> (https://sourceforge.net/p/fluidsynth/tickets/132/) and I ended up > >> cleaning up the autotools infrastructure a bit. > >> > > > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to check if this series of 9 patches made it to the list > > at all, I can see the messages in the archive: > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/fluid-dev/2014-10/threads.html > > but I may have actually sent the emails before I confirmed the > > subscription to the list. > > > > So, were 9 patches from a...@ao2.it delivered to the mailing list on > > Oct 8th? > > Hi, > > Sorry, I forgot to reply to these patch set. > > So, autotools is deprecated because we have switched over to cmake. I > was thinking of dropping it completely, but since you're sending this > patch set seems to indicate that you - and perhaps others - still depend > on autotools. > > Is there a particular reason why the cmake build system does not work > for you? > Hi David, it's just that I am more used to autotools, and I tend to use that when available, but I can use cmake to build fluidsynth with no problems. So, at least for me, it is fine if you only want to support one build system. Regards, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
