Ron,

A few suggestions for the new VUL survey tool:

- On the question type issue: We will need to allow for two types of multiple 
choice questions: one permitting a single answer choice only, another allowing 
for multiple choices. As for fill in the blank type answers, again there should 
be two types: a short type, providing a small, 1-line scroll-less test entry 
box allowing a maximum entry of 5 or 6 words; and a long format, providing a 
three or four line text entry window with a scroll bar allowing for any entry 
length.
 
- Critically, we will want to build in an appropriate way of exporting data 
from the tool so that analysis with stats software such as SPSS is easily 
accommodated. One issue I am aware of from painful experience with York's 
current survey tool: the export module should automatically generate 
SPSS-compatible dichotomous breakdowns of multiple-response answers to 
multiple-choice questions. If for example there are four possible choices (a to 
d) for a question and any or all can be selected as a response, then the export 
tool should break the results down into four separate dichotomous questions (a 
yes/no, b yes/no, etc) as this is the way SPSS requires the data be entered for 
the analysis of multiple-response questions.
 
There are a lot of other issues around effective survey tool implementation 
including the types of options the tool should offer that are too numerous to 
go into here. Blake should be given access to York's survey tool so he can 
explore it and learn what will be required for an effective solution.

Herb

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:23:12 -0400
From: "Ron Owston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: VULab Survey Tool: phpESP (Goodbye?)
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Blake,
Your argument appears to make sense to me but I would also be interested
if anyone else more technically able than me could weigh in.

Assuming that we do go ahead and develop our own, the next question will
be what basic question types we include. I suggest fill-in the blank,
multiple choice, and rating scale (Likert) items for the first iteration
of the tool. Any thoughts from others on this? 
Ron

_______________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list
[email protected]
http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to