OK, I missed this thread. If this has been agreed then fine I will go
ahead and make the change.
After 0.5 I think that we should revisit the naming here as one of
main goals for this code is that it should be plug and play code for
developers which would make these much more than "demos" which in my
mind sounds a bit limiting. "Examples" might capture it better. But
there may be something even more wide and encompassing.
I'll go ahead and change the documentation.
- Eli
On Sep 29, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote:
Thanks for catching this Jacob.
+1 for Functional Demos.
---
Jonathan Hung / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto
Tel: (416) 946-3002
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Anastasia Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On 29-Sep-08, at 10:23 AM, Jacob Farber wrote:
> Hi - I was going through the docs and I just wanted to clarify; the
> Springboards and now known as Functional Demos, right?
> If so, I will make the changes in the docs.
>
If this is the name we're going with, then yes, I'd say +1 to changing
any wiki references to them to "Funtional Demos"
--
Anastasia Cheetham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
_______________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list
[email protected]
http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list
[email protected]
http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley
_______________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list
[email protected]
http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
