Hi David,
Thanks for committing the start to the related objects template. Tiny
recommendation here: I think you should use a list instead of a table
for the 'year', 'subject' etc because it is more semantically correct
in this case. I believe there are FSS classes that will lay out a list
horizontally. http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/FSS+API
Also, it's would probably help to pass the template through the w3c
validator if you haven't already. http://validator.w3.org/
I was just looking at the latest wireframes and I noticed that there
are no longer star ratings for the related object. Also, it seems to
me that the top buttons don't sort the data but actually fetch
different data. This is sounding more and more like a Pager to me but
instead of retrieving the next page worth of data we are getting a
different set of data. The meeting on Tuesday morning should clarify
the functionality implied by the wireframes.
Michelle
On 17-Jul-09, at 3:58 AM, David Trelles wrote:
Hi Everyone.
I'm starting comitting the templates for related objects for Mcord
Demo. This is just an initial html template. This afternoon I'll
commit the template loading the related objects list with json files
and thinking the best way to implement the popularity system for
each one of the objects and sorting the list depending on options
(Artist, Year, Subject, ...).
Thanks.
David.
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
------------------------------------------------------
Michelle D'Souza
Software Developer, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
University of Toronto
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work