Hi David,

Thanks for committing the start to the related objects template. Tiny recommendation here: I think you should use a list instead of a table for the 'year', 'subject' etc because it is more semantically correct in this case. I believe there are FSS classes that will lay out a list horizontally. http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/FSS+API Also, it's would probably help to pass the template through the w3c validator if you haven't already. http://validator.w3.org/

I was just looking at the latest wireframes and I noticed that there are no longer star ratings for the related object. Also, it seems to me that the top buttons don't sort the data but actually fetch different data. This is sounding more and more like a Pager to me but instead of retrieving the next page worth of data we are getting a different set of data. The meeting on Tuesday morning should clarify the functionality implied by the wireframes.

Michelle


On 17-Jul-09, at 3:58 AM, David Trelles wrote:

Hi Everyone.
I'm starting comitting the templates for related objects for Mcord Demo. This is just an initial html template. This afternoon I'll commit the template loading the related objects list with json files and thinking the best way to implement the popularity system for each one of the objects and sorting the list depending on options (Artist, Year, Subject, ...).

Thanks.

David.
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

------------------------------------------------------
Michelle D'Souza
Software Developer, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
University of Toronto



_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to