Hi everyone, The results of Decapod's second round of paper prototype usability testing has been posted to the wiki: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/x/04aI
6 users were tested in total and each test taking about 45 minutes to 1 hour. The results are pretty unanimous: - Export and Save interaction is unclear and sometimes painful. - Expand button was ambiguous in appearance and label. Unclear what is being expanded. - "Magnify all" function has questionable usefulness and was confusing to users. - Zoom function useful, but needs better visual cues to extra functionality that is otherwise hidden. The next steps will be to take a more critical look at the results and determine if a 3rd round of testing is required, or if improvements can be made without having to do another round. After doing testing using Balsamiq, I think I will be writing a blog entry about my experience using a computer to do "paper prototype testing" instead of using physical paper cut-outs. - Jonathan. --- Jonathan Hung / [email protected] Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto Tel: (416) 946-3002
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
