I think your answer makes perfect sense to me. I guess anything that isn't plain text and needs to be version-controlled goes into the SVN, and otherwise its the wiki. I like that plan.
Thanks, Alistair On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM, James William Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Alistair, > > Good question! > > I think it depends what we mean by "research". Here are my thoughts... If > it's research in the form of: > - notes from presentations, website links, and other raw text-like material > relevant to Fluid Engage, it belongs in the wiki > - journal papers, charts/graphs/diagrams authored by someone outside our > project, etc., it may be something we can't put up either on the wiki or in > svn, for copyright reasons > - other binary file materials relevant to Fluid Engage authored by our > project, then yes, I think it belongs in the svn, and possibly the wiki too > > Cheers, > James > > Alistair Jones wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> Kevin: I've been going through the research you sent me a while back. >> Did you pull up anymore good stuff in the meantime? If so send it my >> way, please! >> >> And a bigger question to the group: Should our research documents >> live somewhere on the svn repository? I think it could be really >> nice... Thoughts? >> >> Alistair >> _______________________________________________________ >> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, >> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work >> > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
