In considering how we're going to add Access For All metadata to OERs authored using the OER Commons authoring tool, I've taken a look at microformats and schema.org microdata. I've drafted wiki pages describing how these two options might be used:
schema.org microdata:
http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Proposal+-+Access+For+All+Properties+for+schema.org+Classes
microformats:
http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Proposal+-+Access+For+All+microformat
The microformat option looks tidier and simpler on the surface (it's strictly
classnames added to HTML elements, whereas the schema.org approach requires
additional markup), but on closer examination I think the schema.org approach
provides a better solution (notes on the wiki pages should help elaborate on
why). I look forward to hearing other thoughts.
These are just drafts, and I would really love it if we could pick this apart
and revise and refine.
--
Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre
[email protected] Inclusive Design Institute
OCAD University
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
