Hi Johnny, Thanks for spotting this and letting us know. I've written up a jira about it. http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-4698
Feel free to update it as needed. Thanks Justin On 2012-04-13, at 11:48 AM, Johnny Taylor wrote: > Hi, > > Quite awhile ago I came across an article by Jonathan Snook titled Font > sizing with rem <http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/font-size-with-rem>. > In it he outlined a process of sizing text on a page using a new CSS3 unit > called "rem's." It essentially uses the root, the font-size attached to the > html element, as a consistent reference for sizing text on a page that > employs it. Thus mitigating the em compounding issue (read his article for > more info). Pretty sweet. > > Where this is relevant to this list is I half employed rem's in a project > recently that uses uiOptions. To resolve the compounding issue this was meant > to solve. And the fact I half employed it prevented me from spotting the > issue sooner. But the problem is, and it's a significant issue, elements > using rem's to set their font size are immune to the text sizing options in > uiOptions. As rem's constantly refer to the root, the sizing effect of > uiOptions bypasses the inline styles uiOptions applies to the body! > > Heads up! > > Johnny > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
