> On 2012-03-09 09:16:51, Mike Percy wrote:
> > +1 looks great! I think we should attach this to the JIRA and get it 
> > committed.
> > 
> > Will, I think we should open a separate JIRA to document the thread safety 
> > guarantees. Is that alright with you? Agreed that it's important to 
> > document, but this is already a win and the thread safety guarantees 
> > require careful attention and affect more areas than just the Sink-related 
> > interfaces.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Mike

Ok, agreed.


- Will


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4175/#review5775
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2012-03-09 07:51:16, Juhani Connolly wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4175/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-03-09 07:51:16)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> An initial pass at documenting the interfaces.
> Let me know if I missed anything relevant, or if you feel that this does not 
> correctly represent our expected behaviors.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug FLUME-1019.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1019
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/SinkProcessorFactory.java 
> 10f9f4e 
>   flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/Sink.java 3abeeb6 
>   flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/SinkProcessor.java 11651ad 
>   flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/SinkGroup.java 2e80a56 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4175/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> No changes have been made to code
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Juhani
> 
>

Reply via email to