-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3988/#review6311
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


+1

- Arvind


On 2012-03-23 20:55:21, Brock Noland wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3988/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-03-23 20:55:21)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> 1) All HDFS actions are now done in async mode
> 2) If an HDFS append timesout, the file is closed and reopened.
> 3) Batching is now handled by BucketWriter which was always aware of the 
> batch size.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug FLUME-985.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-985
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/pom.xml bef2ca7 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/BucketWriter.java
>  45769f6 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/HDFSEventSink.java
>  1fdaddd 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/HDFSSequenceFile.java
>  19b2559 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/HDFSBadSeqWriter.java
>  8a6740f 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/HDFSBadWriterFactory.java
>  b067c00 
>   
> flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/TestHDFSEventSink.java
>  8fa72a1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3988/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1) Unit tests were added for close/reopen scenario.
> 2) All unit tests pass
> 3) I manually verified this patch improved FlumeNG's behavior when the 
> datanode it's writing to is restarted. In the past FlumeNG had to be 
> restarted, now Flume moves on and starts writing to a new file.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brock
> 
>

Reply via email to