-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4514/#review7724
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks good to me.

It doesn't seem to patch correctly against the trunk, so  if you could rebase 
it, that would help.

While not relevant to this issue, the configuration for this should really be 
documented, we can't expect end users to  trawl the code to figure it out

If you can  fix these niggles when you rebase it, shoud be good to go


flume-ng-configuration/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/conf/channel/MultiplexingChannelSelectorConfiguration.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4514/#comment17020>

    Changing the name immutableMap to something more descriptive would help 
legibility



flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MultiplexingChannelSelector.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4514/#comment17018>

    weird indentation(this should be ending the function... looks like 
refactoring tools used the wrong closing bracket


- Juhani


On 2012-04-24 04:22:25, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4514/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-04-24 04:22:25)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Channel selector config
> 
> 
> This addresses bug FLUME-1064.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1064
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> flume-ng-configuration/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/conf/channel/MultiplexingChannelSelectorConfiguration.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MultiplexingChannelSelector.java
>  83928b7 
>   
> flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/ReplicatingChannelSelector.java
>  8f22746 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4514/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hari
> 
>

Reply via email to