[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13285041#comment-13285041
]
Hudson commented on FLUME-1229:
-------------------------------
Integrated in flume-trunk #214 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/flume-trunk/214/])
FLUME-1229: Replace nanoTime with currentTimeMillis as BucketWriter base
suffix (Mike Percy via Hari Shreedharan) (Revision 1343922)
FLUME-1229: Replace nanoTime with currentTimeMillis as BucketWriter base suffix
(Revision 1343918)
Result = SUCCESS
hshreedharan : http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=rev&rev=1343922
Files :
*
/incubator/flume/trunk/flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/BucketWriter.java
hshreedharan : http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=rev&rev=1343918
Files :
*
/incubator/flume/trunk/flume-ng-sinks/flume-hdfs-sink/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/sink/hdfs/BucketWriter.java
> System.nanoTime incorrectly used in filename for HDFS file rolling
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLUME-1229
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1229
> Project: Flume
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mike Percy
> Assignee: Mike Percy
> Attachments: FLUME-1229-1.patch
>
>
> Today we use System.nanoTime instead of a proper timestamp such as
> System.currentTimeMillis to give files unique names for rolling. This should
> at a minimum be replaced with System.currentTimeMillis().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
