[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >If manditory transgression is written into the job description of a >particular group of individuals (artists), and if this is depended upon >by another group(s) of people (art enthusiasts) for amusement and/ or >reassurance, then how can those who wish to be 'truly' transgressive >(within the sign/ language of 'art') act out anything more than a >grotesque caricature of culturally reproduced expectations about their >role (as artists)? . . . . . in relation to the above I always think of Crow's line that the Avant-garde is (in its oppositional, transgressive position) nothing more than the research and development arm of late capitalism. Owen
- FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from transgression... scott rigby
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from tran... ann klefstad
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from ... Eryk Salvaggio
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from tran... Owen Smith
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from ... David Baptiste Chirot
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom f... Bertrand et Claudia CLAVEZ
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freed... David Baptiste Chirot
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [... { brad brace }
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from tran... BestPoet
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from tran... BestPoet
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from ... ann klefstad
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from tran... George Free
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom from ... Patricia
- Re: FLUXLIST: Re: trial [freedom f... John Blower