> Noam Chomsky?! Oh the pain.
I don't want to drag this out, but (in a pure desire for knowledge) I
would be interested in any refutation of Chomsky that doesn't resort to
*ad hominem* remarks ... because I haven't seen one (a refutation, that
is) that hews to the same level of rigor he employs. The usual line is to
refer to him as a "corrupting influence," or as a "traitor," or somesuch,
which doesn't really cut it, for me.
Just looking to broaden my horizons ... I'm not drunk ... not at the
moment, anyhoo ...
Thanks,
Glenn Becker
+----------------+
http://www.burningclown.com
"Everyone's Portal to Nothing At All"
+----------------+
