Sure! I've always felt they walked similar paths except that Fluxus was driven in more of a conceptual-based anti-art tack and AP was more a deconstruction of classical art processses, but still concerned with being "art"
AP gives me a really good buzz when I look at it. I get more of an undefineable "That's it!" kind of feeling from a lot of that work, esp Kounellis, Pistoletto(sp? the guy who uses lots of mirrors), than I do from a lot of Fluxus work. But that may also be the difference. I like the process in fluxus, and the product in AP. I've never seen any of it in the flesh, except for some Luciano Fontana (again sp? the punctured canvas guy) who I don't actually care for. Like Yves Klien without the charisma. Finally, something about art, or "art", or whatever it is! Alex >From: ann klefstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Does anyone else want to discuss Fluxus's differences from concurrent >artmaking >such as Arte Povera? To me this would be an interesting thread. > >AK _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
