Alan, have you seen Orfice Flux Plugs by Larry Miller 1974, a fluxkit Hannah Higgins talks about in her book Fluxus Experience (p.34) she states,"the scale of the individual plugs invites the user to hold and finger them: to unroll condoms; to consider soft, small plugs for insertion into the nose ear, vagina, or anus; to examine statuettes that might enter any orifice of the user. Where would this fit? " As well, on the cover of the Orfice Flux Plugs kit the label has a photo of a finger inserted into an anus. Also, I remember reading in Games at the Cedilla, George Brecht or Robert Filliou stating that all sex at the cedilla happens in groups. How about the performance where they pee into a metal bucket and whoever pees the longest wins (sorry, i can't remember the title) anyway, i don't think fluxus is devoid of sexuality, i don't think i would go so far as to call it erotic though.
-david Quoting allen bukoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > in the email today... > > Question: why does SEX/sensuality/eroticism and Fluxus seem to be > in> opposite corners (or is it just me)? Are/were historical Fluxus> performances/objects/games/activities devoid of sexuality--even the > ones> that seemed to address gender or sexuality issues (or is that just > a> misreading on my part)? Don't get me wrong, I love Fluxus, I not > saying> here that it's "missing" anything. It's just that of all the things > I love> a lot, Fluxus seems to have the least sex or sexuality in its soul. > Or am> I missing something? Allen
