Does this mean that secretFLUXUStrevallyn are
- a bunch of impostors
- charlatans
- fraudulent pretenders
- ratbags
- irrelevant imitators
- extraneous prats
- unimportant fools
- con-artist
- insignificant people
- false profits OR simply
- <SILLYbuggers>
Because its worldSILLYweek and <LOONIEmonday> I needed 11 alternatives but seriously I would appreciate your, indeed anyone’s, advice on this in order that I can pass your judgment on to secretFLUXUStrevallyn who will be performing in the streets here at the edge on <NUTTYthursaday> June 24.
Cheers, Ray
worldSILLYweek June 18 to 28 2004
11 Days of sanctioned social transgression and serious pisstaking all in the cause of charity
For More Information Contact Ray Norman
Website: <http://www.SillyWeek.com>
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21/6/04 5:29 PM, "secret fluxus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Ms. Forer,
We don't recall whether Allan Revich signed one of his messages as Secret
Fluxus, but he is not one of us.
We have made the astonished discovery that artists in several places now
claim to be members of Secret Fluxus. There is a simple way to tell who is
NOT a member of Secret Fluxus. No one who claims to be a member of Secret
Fluxus is one of us. The members of our little chamber orchestra are known
only to one another and to a few family members who sometimes perform with
us or join us in family picnics while we plan our activities.
As Lord Russell would have noted, this makes it easy to know who is NOT
Secret Fluxus while making it impossible to know who IS.
We gather from the tone of Mr. Revich's communication that he does not wish
anyone to mistake him for one of the four women or the four lovable moptops
in our group. Of course, if we were Beatles Imitators, it would obviously
leave room for a Yoko Ono Imitator in our midst. This raises a thorny issue,
since we do not wish to imitate Fluxus artists. We only wish to perform
their work.
Sincerely,
Secret Fluxus
(The allusion to ?four lovable moptops? is a Silly Week joke. None of us is
a moptop. One male has very long hair, the second is normal, our ?handsome
Beatle? is bald ? or at least tonsured, and the solicitor looks even more
normal than the normal one.)
>Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:35:38 -0400
>From: Kathy Forer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Apologies to Alan Bowman
>
>On 6/20/04 2:06 PM, "secret fluxus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We did not intend the mildly irate reply that we
> > posted by misreading the header on his short note as the header for
>Allan
> > Revich's long note and harsh list of labels.
>
>
>But is or isn't Allen Revich "one of you"? Has he not at one time signed
>his
>own messages as "Secret Fluxus"?
>
>Or was that some or another sort of mis/appropriation?
>
> > "Dear women and four Beatles imitators,"
_________________________________________________________________
Want to block unwanted pop-ups? Download the free MSN Toolbar now!
http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/
