Hi all, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Kassen <[email protected]> wrote: > of this was obvious. I didn't do the math, I'll trust Matt that it checks > out. I would BTW expect these numbers to depend on the samplerate that
All I did was ask Excel fit an exponential to those numbers (leaving out the zero). As the saying goes, "It looks like an exponential, and quacks like an exponential..." Whether those are meaningful coefficients, that's another thing entirely... Cheers, Matt
