On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:46:51AM -0500, Joel Matthys wrote: > > Ugh, I see. I was learning as I went along about this stuff. Thanks!
No problem. We all are learning. > That should be easy. It's stored in the *scala-size* variable. (BTW, > it's probably better to say 'notes' in an octave. Keys means too many > things to different people! Ah, and here I was avoiding "notes" as I thought it could be ambiguous. "defined pitches in the table", I mean. I'm anticipating this will be fun for generative pieces that will work in multiple tunings, and well, if that's a bad idea it's a simple feature. > Oh, I like that. Good idea! Great, then I add that too. > I don't know of any standard. Your idea makes a lot of sense. I like the > "scala-defaults" command. As I look back on it, I'm a little surprised > at myself for resetting the diapason and base-key every time the scale > changes. I can't think of any good reason for doing so. Ah, to be young > and foolish again, back in December... All quite ok. I very much like this model of development. Where we can all contribute a bit and come up with a decent end result. I'll get back to work on this tomorrow, stuff popped up today. Thanks! Kas.
