Barrie,

What field are you typing into in the portal?


Steve Abrahamson
Ascending Technologies
FileMaker Certified Developer
        http://www.asctech.com
        [email protected]


On Mar 12, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Barrie Phillips wrote:

> I'm working with a database with 11 tables, in FMP Advanced 9.5 on a Mac.
> 
> The main 'People' table contains the names and ID numbers (and other 
> information) of all the individuals in the database. Because it is important 
> that I keep track of any edits to any of the records, edits are done 
> non-desctructively. I do this by considering each original record (or the 
> last edited version) to be 'current', and since I generally only want to 
> display 'current' records the match field between all the tables is the 
> concatenation of the ID number and the 'current' indicator (yes/no). During 
> the edit process the original record is duplicated but the 'current' flag is 
> set to 'No', and the edit is made to the new record.
> 
> The individuals are added to a 'People' table at which time the ID number 
> (this is a 'person' ID number and not a serial record ID number) is assigned 
> consecutively and the record is set as current. All the remaining tables are 
> presented in portals on six tabbed cards, several of which contain their own 
> nested sub-cards. The cards are set to show data from the 'People' table, 
> while the portals show data from the related tables. The match fields for 
> both the 'Individual' field and the related field are on the card (with data 
> from the 'Individuals' table) and in the related portal.
> 
> My problem is that despite the fact that the relationships are set up to 
> allow record creation in the related table from the 'People' table I cannot 
> do so by simply placing the cursor in a field in the portal and typing. I get 
> a message telling me that the field is not modifiable. I can make it work by 
> including a scripted button on the portal row to create a new record in the 
> related table, and everything works fine. However, I shouldn't have to 
> explicitly script record creation and I cannot figure out what I'm doing 
> wrong.
> 
> I'm not certain if this is enough information, but I would appreciate any 
> help you might be able to offer.

Reply via email to