That's the point. To get an idea of how I would integrate it I would have to see the schema.
Is that available in the test file? j. On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:10 PM, David Haney wrote: > Jonathan, > > No confusion, just wanted a better feel for your term “bolt-on”, but I got > it. The accounting template is specifically designed for integration into > existing solutions. Its a basic template and easy to reverse-engineer so you > can add functions and easily integrate. I’ve seen several different ways > others have integrated it and was interested in how you would do it. Its all > cool! > > David Haney > ADVANCE DATABASE SYSTEMS LLC > PO Box 17410, Phoenix, AZ 85011 > http://advancedatabasesystems.com > [email protected] > Phone: 602-253-2200 > > ---Original Message--- > > From: Jonathan Fletcher <[email protected]> > Reply-To: FileMaker Pro Discussions <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:59:56 -0400 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [TEST REQUEST] FileMaker Accounting > > I'm sorry. I thought that your solution was meant to work closely with other > solutions. Integrating an accounting module into, say, an order and inventory > system, would be to "bolt it on." > > Sorry to be confusing. -- Jonathan Fletcher FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer Fletcher Data Consulting [email protected] http://www.fletcherdata.com 502-509-7137 Kentuckiana's FileMaker Users Group Next meeting: April 26, 12:00 pm to 3:00-ish Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com Blog: http://www.kyfmp.com
