I understand that, thank you but in my situation I have to work with "real" 
data, 
I must use key fields  from a data base not of my creation.

Am simply asking is it better to make iterations of tables so that I do not 
burden one set of tables with all the relationships  in case one criterion 
(match field ) does not match.






On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:03 AM, Richard S. Russell wrote:

On 2012 Jun 4, at 0:52, Barbara Passman wrote:

> When establishing relatioh-ships between two tables, and more than one key 
> field is used, is it better to enter all the key relationships in the two 
> tables, or , using duplicate tables, use each dyad to link by single key 
> field?
> 
> Example
> Linking  between two tables , using Surname, First Name and Home Telephone
> Am I wiser to  have Table A1related to Table B1 via Surname and First Name
> And then show the relationship between Home Telephones in Table A2 and B2?
> 
> What happens if I link Surname, First Name and Home Telephone (all three key 
> fields ) between one iteration of each table Table A and Table B and two of 
> the three key fields match but a third does not ?
> Will the portal in Table A still show the related data from Table B even 
> though  the Home Telephone numbers do not match between Table A and Table B?
> 
> I guess what I am asking is whether Filemaker understands the selection of 
> several Key field relationships as implying 
> First Name AND Last Name AND Telephone to see the relationship?
> Or will Filemaker see the relationship  if ANY of the Key fields match ?
> 
> I have never seen any explanation of this.


Barbara, you are using what are called "intelligent keys", and you'd think from 
the name that that's a smart thing to do. In fact, you're usually better off 
using "dumb keys" — that is, an arbitrary (but unique) sequence number to 
identify each record. Suppose you're matching Susan Johnson, phone 234-5678 and 
she gets a new phone. Or gets married and gets a new surname. Changing you data 
will break any links BASED on that data. But if Susan has a unique code number 
that has no intrinsic meaning, there will never be any reason to change it, and 
any relationships BASED on that unique ID code will remain intact no matter 
what you do to her name or phone number.

Reply via email to