Good point, Terry.

I still have to make another plug for the application compatibility toolkit.
(I don't work for Microsoft, I just think that it is one of Microsoft's
best-completely-underpublicized offerings.) 

For those who haven't taken a look at it, it's worth evaluating:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows/appcompatibility/defaul
t.mspx (for XP SP2; I don't know if it's also for 2000/2003)
and
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7fc46855-b8a4-46cd-
a236-3159970fde94&DisplayLang=en plus
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnanchor/ht
ml/appcompat.asp (for Win2K, WinXP and Win2K3)

Laura

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Browning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:44 AM
> To: Peter Hyvonen
> Cc: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: On the topic of Windows Hardening
> 
> When loosening permissions to allow an application to run, 
> don't just allow all users the extra permissions, or named 
> users; create a new user group and give this new group the 
> extra permissions, then give specific users membership of the group.
> 
> The permissions for the group are tweaked to allow the 
> application to run, and to keep the application running when 
> the developers take yet more liberties with security in the 
> future. It's also clearer, when looking at the permissions 
> for a folder or file, to figure out why the permissions are 
> so relaxed.
> 
> Only those users who need the extra access will get it, and 
> maintaining group membership becomes a separate task, which 
> could be delegated to a different admin.
> 
> Aside: Is there an SGID-like mechanism in Windows?
> 
> Peter Hyvonen wrote:
> > Its there a way to 'fake' an administrator account? I ask 
> because our 
> > MRP software requires the user have complete local privliges (power 
> > user accounts do not work) I've complained but changing MRP 
> software 
> > is not an option. We have alot of small fires because the 
> users of the 
> > MRP software have to be administrator on their own box. Thanks in 
> > advance
> > 
> > Pete Hyvonen
> > Systems Specialist
> > Self Charge Inc.
> > 
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----
> > 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to