It's not likely that your domain policy is being overwritten. Rather, your domain policy is undefined for the setting in question, which means that it is not overriding the local policy. To solve the problem while reducing processing overhead caused by conflicting policy settings:
1. Change the local policy settings to "undefined". If this is a file system permissions setting, remove it. 2. Define the policy in the appropriate group policy in AD. Alternately, there may simply be a group policy in AD already that defines the setting and is overwriting the policy you're viewing. Third possibility- what you're seeing is a group policy that is *implementing* the setting in question, and it's not actually being set at all at the individual machine level. Use GPResult or GPMC RSOP to find out what policies are actually being applied to the machine. Laura P.S. Best advice- when working in an AD environment, don't use local group policies. Use only AD group policies. :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Milind Nanal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Domain policy getting override on local > > > We have windows 2000 exchange server setup with active > directory. Additionally we have Win2k3 server. All these > days we were sharing few folders of Win2k3 server. Now we are > not able to access win2k3 server from any other system. After > checking it was observed that effective setting are wiped out > in below area > > Security setting - local security policy - User right > assignment - access this computer from network > > If have to manually add permission for everyone group in > access this computer from network. > > After few minutes again the effective value goes blank. I > fill some domain policy are getting override on this local > security setting. > How do I resolve this problem? I want this win2k3 server as > part of same domain. we have never faced this problem in past > &we have not done any changes in domain policy I don't know > how this problem is appearing now. > > Your response in solution to this is highly appreciated. > > > Regards, > > Milind > > > > Disclaimer: > This e-mail may contain Privileged/Confidential information > and is intended only for the individual(s) named. Please > notify the sender, if you have received this e-mail by > mistake and delete it from your system. > Information in this message that do not relate to the > official business of the company shall be understood as > neither given nor endorsed by it. > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or > error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any > errors or omissions in the contents of this message which > arise as a result of e-mail transmission. > If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. > Visit us at www.kaleconsultants.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
